Wednesday 15 December 2010

OUGD 301 Evaluation

This module was extremely challenging, firstly because negotiating my own briefs took a lot longer than I wanted. I got confused for at least the first week on how to even begin deciding what I wanted to do, despite the workshops. After the brief proposals during the second week I was even more confused, I had no idea what subjects I wanted to address. For some reason I could not see how I could generate or obtain the content to create what I wanted to do. Instead of fretting I simply sat down and started designing something, it worked and a week later my first substantial brief was well under way. Over the duration of this module I have learned the most important lesson of all, that anything can become a brief. A word, a place, a time or simply a concept. Therefore at present I feel fairly confident going away and thinking about what to do for my FMP, knowing that whatever I think of in the end can untimely be turned into an exciting brief.

Although the briefs I ended up taking on were not at all what I would have expected to be doing they all benefited me in their own way. I knew that I wanted to progress my ability with typography and layout, across a range of formats for print. I learned how to quickly mock up books and evaluate the content of the layout effectively in a short time. This was evident with the LCD brief, where I had to mock up a copy every few hours to make sure the readability was fine and that the decisions I made were working. The process has been hammered into my brain to the extent that forgetting it is most likely impossible. It will make creating publications much easier for the next half of the year.

My knowledge of typefaces, grids, format and hierarchy has greatly improved. Up until now I had felt I was simply pushing type around on a page, searching for an aesthetic and functional resolution. However, exemplified by the ‘X’, LBW and LCD briefs, I am confident that my design has become concept driven, with appropriate layout choices applied to each brief. Although there is not necessarily a personal ‘style’ of work evolving, I do feel for the first time that I can say that I am a becoming or even am a specialist in this subject, and that taking on any brief concerning layout and type will not be over my head. Perhaps that is a bold statement, but I stand by it until proved wrong.

Saying that, my Leeds Bike Week publication was not as good as I had hoped. It worked as a piece of functional design, but as a practice in creative layout I do not feel I pushed the boundaries as much as I could have. I felt that I needed to take sure the content came first. This is probably because the information was such that it needed to be communicated clearly and in an understandable way for a wide target audience. If it had been aimed at a creative audience I would have felt I could have made much bolder decisions. For this reason I spent a long time on the LCD brief creating experimental layouts that could never function in that context. Playing with the grid and the golden section, canceling out the layout solution that were not working but did look good has given me a sounder knowledge of functional layout.

The LCD brief also gave me the chance to re-address book binding, something I try to avoid as my hands on skills are poor. As usual all my mock up binds worked better than the final, so I intend to make it again and get it right. I think it will be a very strong piece of work in my portfolio. I am very happy about his because my main concern after 2nd year was that my portfolio was lacking in good design, certainly in comparison to the work I have now. For this reason I am very excited about the FMP.

I had written in my rationale that I wanted to be better at quick turn around identity design specifically, s over the summer while on experience I was given 3 hours to create four logo proposals. I managed to do it, but the designs were not up to a standard I had hoped I would be at. I felt it was important to be strict with myself when designing these identities and spend no more than 2 days on each. The BUC (Bournemouth University Climbing) logo design was very tricky. As a climber I was aware of current climbing logos, and how they all conform to a technical / serious tone. My client, the president of the climbing club wanted a fresh look, happy, approachable and nature based. My resolved design was approved and will be going into print on hoodies, T-shirts and a small promotion range. This gave me confidence that even though getting stuck on an identity design is stressful and can be a worrying time, a solution can always be found and after a few days of searching it will most likely be successful.

The module was challenging and stressful at times, but it has armed me with the confidence and the technical skills to take me through to my FMP with a confidence I would have paid for.

Thursday 4 November 2010

Tutorial 04/11/10

I had my tutorial with Lorenzo today. I knew it was going to be a bit confusing because I am a bit confused myself these days, which is not nice. The general gist was that I should be focusing in on specifics, so that my work has a goal and a clear idea of what I am to get out of the brief. For example working with hierarchy – scale, position and colour. Also aiming to progress my design techniques, such as reverse out and colour, and seeing how far I can push them.

Also I am aware that I take briefs to literally and do not think ‘graphically’ necessarily. Meaning when I am working with a particular subject or sector, do not try to literally re-create my findings, but use them as a base of understanding for the subject, then consider how understanding it in more depth can be related conceptually into my work. This is related to the start of a brief. I need to spend more time at the beginning, just an hour or so understanding what the essence of the subject.

As for writing briefs, I need to be wary to write specific details, make it focused and clear as if it were an experienced client writing it.

So now what I should do potentially is write out a list of sectors that I want to design for and then aim to produce layout work that is aimed at getting their attention, this will force me into making specific typographic and layout based decisions. If it is for a construction manual for example, rigid / sharp angular type with a layout that follows that idea would be suitable. If I were designing for something nature based be more free and gentle. Basically I need to show that I have variation. The problem I have found is that I, like most people do not really have a specific audience I want to design for. So this naturally leads me to the conclusion that I should be good at working with layout in a much more diverse way.

Also a little note. Do not take on too much live work from un-experienced clients.

Monday 27 September 2010

Thursday 23 September 2010

WHAT & NOT to do

This is what I want to do

* I want to engage with typography and layout on a higher level of understanding. Not just for aesthetics and function, but also using design theory to inform the work. Therefore I need to research and practice using layout design theory within my work and experimental projects.

* I want to work with a subject matter that is close to me personally; an interest and passion of mine. This will either therefore be rock climbing or cycling. For this I need to consider the context in which I am designing for. It may be for a current brand or perhaps it could be skills based. (Print, illustration, type). The format and overall aim of the outcome will largely dictate how I begin designing.

* While working mainly with type and layout, I also want to create a brand identity, as well as a range of relevant products and promotion. This may be for an existing company or for a new company, which will act as the vehicle for experimentation.

* Book designs including layout of content. Not specifically any type of book in particular, but something involving type and creative layout.

* Use print & print processes and substrates to create hand made work. This includes hand drawn illustration and possibly hand drawn type.



This is what I do not want to do

* Design for web. However I do need to learn CSS (Dreamweaver) so I can gradually begin working on a website.

* Spend time learning new software skills on top of what I already have. A bit more progress using illustrator, but over all I think I have the skills I need for the work I am aiming to produce.

* Moving image. I am simply staying clear of it this year. Although in the future they may be room for some experimentation; not until the course is over however.

* Date visualization. Although it is looks great, and is fun to figure out once the information and data is collated, the process of researching facts and figures is far too dull. Working from something such an annual report, sourced from an existing company would be fine.